Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

Build to rent – are you making the right insurance choices?

By Michael Cook | June 30, 2023

How does build-to-rent differ from the traditional build-to-own model and what are the insurance implications for builders, developers and owners?
N/A
N/A

As Australia continues to grapple with housing affordability and supply, Build-to-Rent (BTR) developments are becoming more prevalent. A Property Council of Australia report released in April 2023 estimated the BTR sector accounts for roughly 0.2 % of Australia’s residential housing, compared to 5.4 % in the UK and 12 % in the US. For developers, builders and investors, interest in BTR is increasing due in no small part to perceptions that office rental returns have fallen since the onset of COVID and remote working.

Earlier this year, the federal government set a target of building an additional one million homes within five years. Growth in BTR will prove to be vital in helping achieve this target.

But how does BTR differ from the traditional build-to-own model? Basically, with residences designed and constructed with the specific purpose of being rented rather than sold to individuals, it is the developer who retains ownership, and manages and maintains the buildings – sometimes with the participation of an investment fund, or pool of investors. The aim of BTR is to encourage long-term renters, so building amenities (including domestic appliances, cleaning, and maintenance) may be more extensive than a normal strata/build-to-own arrangement.

Tenants often have greater flexibility, with the ability to switch between residences within the same complex to accommodate their changing circumstances. An element of affordable housing may also be included in the project. WTW is aware of a host of developments that have commenced in Sydney and Melbourne. One major project in Melbourne, in inner-suburban Footscray, comprises 700 dwellings and a mix of commercial and complementary retail and entertainment facilities.

A different insurance landscape

BTR developments are retained by the builder or developer, which places them outside of strata regulation under the various state-based registration schemes. Nevertheless, many traditional strata-type insurance cover components still apply – including property cover for the building, associated liability, shared or common contents, machinery breakdown for air conditioners and lifts, loss of rent for the developer and office bearer’s liability for elected representatives.

However additional elements may also be required, including for supplied apartment contents, or longer than 12 months loss of rent cover.

From a risk management viewpoint, securing cover which includes the construction phase of the building itself (along with any staged or partial handovers) through to completion and then into occupation as an operating community hub has advantages. It offers a seamless transition between the otherwise separate insurances and demarcation issues are avoided during handover and the maintenance defects period.

Importantly, this arrangement achieves certainty in costs along with cover. It can also incorporate delay in start-up cover to protect potential revenue streams.

Here’s how the BTR model works:

Proposed insurance program design

Author


Associate, Client Service & Delivery

Related content tags, list of links Article Construction
Contact us