Australia continues to grapple with housing affordability and supply, and while the build-to-rent (BTR) market is growing, it still represents a fraction of residential housing. With federal and state governments now providing incentives, this will stimulate the influx of capital into the sector and result in a significant uptick in BTR that will be vital in helping achieve housing targets.
But there are implications for insurance coverage because BTR differs from the traditional build-to-sell model. Residences are designed and constructed with the specific purpose of being rented rather than sold to individuals, with the developer retaining ownership, and managing and maintaining the buildings – sometimes with the participation of an investment fund, or pool of investors.
Why is the insurance landscape different?
BTR developments are retained by the developer, placing them outside of strata regulation under the various state-based registration schemes. The BTR model has different insurance requirements, exposures, and vested interests. Some of the issues you need to consider include:
- Construction delays having a direct impact on forward rental income for the developer
- Rental losses during operational phase can be significant as the developer owns and operates the entire building
- The developer has a financial interest from construction through to and including the operational phase
- Handover from construction to the operational phase may not be traditional and incorporate early occupation or handover, or a staged handover.