Home to the world’s second largest capital market, China is an increasingly attractive investment destination for global investors as the nation has gradually liberalized its capital account over the past decade. During the same period, the global investment community has undergone a sustainable investment (SI) revolution, propelling sustainability considerations to the forefront of many investment decision-making processes.
When speaking to many institutional investors about China allocations, ESG considerations often occupy a substantial part of the discussion. It is not unusual for enthusiasm to give way to some concerns and skepticism when the discussion moves from economic/return prospects to ESG.
In this two-part series we offer our thoughts on the most important questions that sit in the intersection of major sustainable investment trends and that are likely to shape global institutional investing for the decades to come.
01
This part asks the question: “Does the investment case still hold for allocation to China if environmental, social and governance (ESG) characteristics of its assets are properly taken into account?”
We believe the answer to this question is yes, and list out three main parts of our argument. Our aim is to address the common concerns and help institutional investors build a more informed understanding of China’s SI practice and its future outlook.
02
This concluding part asks the question: “How should investors implement their China allocation to manage ESG-related risks, as well as exploring ESG-driven opportunities?”
We lay out the way we incorporate ESG considerations while constructing a portfolio, and why skilled active management should be front and center of any institutional solutions access to China.
This page contains links to certain historical documents which were issued by Willis Towers Watson (WTW) as at the date specified on each linked document, in relation to the products offered by WTW. WTW believes that it is useful to investors to retain these documents on our website, for your information and reference purposes. Each such document was assessed as being compliant with prevailing regulatory requirements as at its date of issue, including that its contents are fair, clear and not misleading. Given that these documents were issued as at a specific point in time, WTW does not believe it would be appropriate to retrospectively amend those documents. As a result such documents have not been reviewed in light of any subsequent regulatory guidance or market practice including the FCA’s anti-greenwashing guidance (FG24/3). Any persons accessing this page, and the documents made available on this page, should not seek to rely on such documents and should use them only for information or reference purposes. Any investment decision should be based exclusively on the formal offer and subscription documents for the relevant investment product, and not these historical documents.
Title | File Type | File Size |
---|---|---|
Part 1: The case for including China in a sustainability focused portfolio | 2.3 MB | |
Part 2: Incorporating ESG in portfolio design and implementation considerations | 2.1 MB |