Missing the Wood for the Trees

Economies need to significantly and immediately start reducing emissions, but realistically, some sectors are unlikely to become completely emission-free by 2050. Due to the inability of certain sectors to reduce emissions fully by 2050, an alternative to account for their share of CO₂ emissions reductions must be sought. A first step in achieving this is for net deforestation to rapidly come to a halt and even be reversed to balance those unavoidable emissions. A second step would likely require incentives to be created such that the various economic actors reduce their emissions such that we stand a chance at fulfilling the Paris Agreement.

While it is understood that nature-based solutions, such as Forestry, are not the whole solution and should not be undertaken in lieu of reducing carbon emissions, they will inevitably play a role in the decarbonization challenge, while other forms of carbon capture or sequestration are more commercially developed. The bigger picture is that achieving net zero actually requires investments that provide carbon capture and sequestration, acknowledging there will remain unavoidable emissions, even in a highly decarbonized economy that has fully embraced new technologies and substitutions.

Institutional investors should consider the first-mover opportunity in acquiring Forestry with strong carbon sequestration potential while the asset class remains priced in a historical context based on timber value or alternative use, rather than its additional climate positive potential. Furthermore, investors effectively have an option based on carbon offset pricing, which is difficult to price but we expect could increase faster than what is currently priced in and become highly valuable in the future.

In our analogy, the Trees represent the various changes and engagement activities that institutional investors can deploy to decarbonize portfolios. However, there is an important acknowledgement that the bigger picture and raft of measures required to achieved net zero, the Wood in our analogy, necessarily requires some carbon sequestration to be part of the decarbonization puzzle. Investors and corporates with a long-term mindset should consider blending investments in Forestry and other nature-based solutions alongside the decarbonization in their traditional investment portfolios.

Notice for UK persons accessing this page

This page contains links to certain historical documents which were issued by Willis Towers Watson (WTW) as at the date specified on each linked document, in relation to the products offered by WTW. WTW believes that it is useful to investors to retain these documents on our website, for your information and reference purposes. Each such document was assessed as being compliant with prevailing regulatory requirements as at its date of issue, including that its contents are fair, clear and not misleading. Given that these documents were issued as at a specific point in time, WTW does not believe it would be appropriate to retrospectively amend those documents. As a result such documents have not been reviewed in light of any subsequent regulatory guidance or market practice including the FCA’s anti-greenwashing guidance (FG24/3). Any persons accessing this page, and the documents made available on this page, should not seek to rely on such documents and should use them only for information or reference purposes. Any investment decision should be based exclusively on the formal offer and subscription documents for the relevant investment product, and not these historical documents.