The departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury have released FAQs Part 59 addressing the recent federal district court decision in Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra. The decision blocked the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA’s) requirement for non-grandfathered group health plans to cover certain preventive healthcare services recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) without cost sharing (i.e., no co-pays, deductibles or coinsurance).1 The FAQs discuss the effect of the case in general and also address the effect on high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) as well as the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act’s rapid coverage of preventive services and vaccine requirements implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Note: The Department of Justice filed an appeal in the Braidwood case on March 31, 2023, followed by a motion for a stay on April 12, 2023. Although the litigation is ongoing, the departments state in FAQs Part 59 that they encourage group health plans to continue providing preventive care in accordance with the intent of the ACA, even if not required as a result of any final court decisions.
The departments issued the new FAQs to provide initial guidance on how Braidwood affects the ACA requirement to cover certain preventive services without cost sharing. Additional guidance will likely be issued.
After Braidwood, an HDHP may, until further guidance is issued, continue to provide benefits for items and services recommended with an A or B rating by the USPSTF on or after March 23, 2010, before the minimum annual deductible is met regardless of whether they must be covered without cost sharing under the ACA.
Under the CARES Act, non-grandfathered group health plans must cover, without cost sharing, any qualifying coronavirus preventive service, including those recommended by the USPSTF and those recommended by ACIP. Coverage must begin 15 business days after the date of the recommendation. According to the FAQs, plans must continue to cover immunizations recommended by ACIP without cost sharing, but because the USPSTF has not recommended any qualifying coronavirus preventive services with an A or B rating, the Braidwood decision has no related effect on plans.
Employers should monitor developments in the Braidwood case to determine next steps. If the court’s decision holds, then employers must determine whether they will continue to provide preventive care recommended by the USPSTF after March 23, 2010. Plans have the following options:
While plans can change the ACA preventive care provisions that are blocked by Braidwood, they must continue to cover preventive care in place before the ACA (i.e., before March 23, 2010), as well as preventive care under ACIP and HRSA, without cost sharing (including COVID-19 preventive care and immunizations recommended by ACIP and HRSA).
1 See “Federal court issues nationwide injunction on some ACA preventive care,” Insider, April 2023.
Title | File Type | File Size |
---|---|---|
Insider April 2023 | .2 MB |