Does the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA) gag clause prohibition compliance attestation requirement apply to benefits such as carved-out prescription drug or behavioral health coverage, employee assistance programs (EAPs) and ancillary benefits?
The CAA gag clause prohibition compliance attestation requirement applies to group health plan coverage but not to “excepted benefits.” Which benefits qualify as excepted benefits is determined on a case-by-case basis, with the assistance of an employer’s legal counsel.
Most employers provide group health benefits — including medical, prescription drug and behavioral health coverage — to their employees and their employees’ family members. The CAA gag clause prohibition compliance attestation requirement applies to these benefits, even if they are carved out. Often, employers also provide additional benefits such as vision and dental coverage, EAPs and other ancillary benefits (often virtual or app-based). These ancillary benefits cover specific healthcare issues such as diabetes, musculoskeletal and mental health conditions. The attestation requirement may apply to these benefits as well.
Under the CAA, group health plans and issuers that offer group health insurance may not enter into agreements with providers, third-party administrators or other service providers that include a “gag clause,” defined as a contractual term that directly or indirectly restricts specific data and information that a plan or issuer can make available to another party.[1] Plans and issuers must attest that they comply with these requirements by December 31 each year.
This requirement applies to fully insured and self-insured group health plans, including ERISA plans, non-federal governmental plans and church plans subject to the Internal Revenue Code. This means that major medical plans, prescription drug plans and behavioral health plans (even if they are carved out) are all required to submit the annual attestation; however, the following plans are not required to do so:
There are four categories of excepted benefits:
Benefits ancillary to an employer’s major medical plan may be required to file a gag clause prohibition compliance attestation unless the benefit is determined to be a supplemental excepted benefit.
EAPs must meet four requirements to qualify as excepted benefits. The EAP cannot:
The first requirement above is the hardest to interpret given that the government has not issued guidance on what constitutes “significant benefits in the nature of medical care” (e.g., visit limits, costs).
These benefits will need to be reviewed on an employer plan-by-plan basis, as the rules for determining a plan’s excepted benefit status are not well laid out. While many supplemental benefit vendors share “legal opinions” with their potential clients regarding the excepted benefit status of their products, employers will want to conduct an independent review with their legal counsel to determine if the product qualifies as an excepted benefit.
While WTW can provide information about the requirements for determining whether a benefit is excepted — and therefore not subject to the CAA’s gag clause prohibition requirements — the actual determination should be made by employers in conjunction with their legal counsel.